At 04:59 PM 8/16/00 -0400, John Porter wrote: > > > > What interpretation should be placed on statements in the try block > > > > following a catch block? > > > > > >Whatever you want. I can think of three possibilities. > > > > That's the problem. Only one of them will be right. > >Only one of them needs to be right. As long as one is right, >there is no problem. Right, I was just pointing out that it's harder for people to divine which one we picked without recourse to the documentation. But I think you called it best when you pointed out the other problem with daisy chaining. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Tony Olekshy
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Chaim Frenkel
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Graham Barr
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Piers Cawley
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw&quo... Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw... John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" David L. Nicol