Re: English language basis for "throw"

[Peter Scott]

Redirected to -errors to save a thousand eyeballs.

At 11:42 AM 8/16/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
>Peter Scott wrote:
> > At 05:33 PM 8/15/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > >The thing I don't like about C++/Java try/catch syntax is the way
> > >the blocks are daisychained.  That is not intuitive to the flow.
> >
> > I find it quite intuitive :-)
>
>I note the smiley.

It works without the smiley too.

> > What interpretation should be placed on statements in the try block
> > following a catch block?
>
>Whatever you want.  I can think of three possibilities.

That's the problem.  Only one of them will be right.

--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies