On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Dale Ghent <da...@elemental.org> wrote: > On Feb 10, 2009, at 11:22 PM, Jason King wrote: > > > Quite reasonable. This is a great idea, Jason. I just love telemetry and > this is a great idea. > > One thing to note, there's a RFE and (maybe? I think?) an associated ARC out > there to bring SMA/net-snmpd's codebase up to something more contemporary. > Right now it's 5.0.9-based. This will have an effect this project so I think > we should get a contract against SMA first thing, and code it with the > net-snmp API changes between 5.0.x and 5.4.x in mind. > > Is there someone from within Sun who could help arrange such a contract?
I'll take a look at the docs and see how much of a difference there is for MIB modules between the two. I have no idea, I guess we'll have to ask around. IIRC, sma is part of the SFW consolidation, so perhaps sfwnv-discuss? _______________________________________________ perf-discuss mailing list perf-discuss@opensolaris.org
