My real interest is forest and landscape images, and the great majority of
these are done with ISO as low as it can go, on a tripod. In general
terms,
it's this I miss film for.
What's to miss - you can still shoot at low ISO ?
Not understanding your comment.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Malcolm Smith" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: 35mm film v 35mm DSLR
Larry Colen wrote:
But you then go on to look only at resolution. I can pretty much
guarantee that any photo that I've taken in the past several years at
an ISO of over 1600 is far better quality than I could have gotten with
any 35mm film camera.
You got me there Larry, I am always amazed at how well digital can perform
at high ISO. I will, in general take a DSLR for some grab shots of things
out and about and in the evening.
My real interest is forest and landscape images, and the great majority of
these are done with ISO as low as it can go, on a tripod. In general
terms,
it's this I miss film for.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
