FWIW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpCOoNh6evE
On 2/10/2015 2:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I extracted the polaroid negative (FP-100c film using a Polaroid Land
350 camera), scanned that, and printed it. I think that's 'real' film
… :-)
I'd been meaning try the process for a while. Basically, you take a
photo, wash the backing off the negative with a light chlorine
solution, and then wash and dry the negative. I shot a few test
frames to see how it would go. The results are good, but the photos
aren't anything I want to post. It was a test …
I think I can do the same with FP-3000b, have to experiment.
Of course, with integral type films (Impossible film for Spectra,
SX-70, etc) there is no separable negative so with those I have to
scan or photograph the original positive, and then print that. The
original print is still 'real' film… :-)
G
On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:43 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]>
wrote:
Um... yes but did you use real film to do it? You scanned it and
printed from the scan - correct ?
Um, yesterday. I printed two of my Polaroid shots to 9x12.
G
On Feb 9, 2015, at 8:56 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm talking 'real film' - when's the last time you saw an
enlargement from a Polaroid?
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
