On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Boris Liberman <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, guys, guys... I think you missed the point entirely here. Have you > read the comments under that blog post? > > Two thoughts crossed my mind that evening (when I read them): > > 1. That lady seems to be a minor FB celebrity. I don't have FB acct so I > cannot check, but she seems to have very loud voice and she seems to > say things that many don't take gladly. Whether or not she's right is > totally beside this specific point I'm about to make. What I'm saying here > is that having such an image on FB (for all I know in real life she may be > entirely different person), it seems only natural to me that she has > "enemies" or people who are on a look out for her even most minor misstep to > make her FB life bitter. It seems to be the case here. It totally has > nothing to do with what is shown on that picture as long as "formally" the > FB rules may be invoked. > That's what I believe happened (though I have no idea who she is). It only takes one person to report a picture. Reposting the picture didn't help anything.
> 2. The other point that struck me here was the fact that if I understand > correctly she posted the photograph of her baby girl in public access. > You see, when Paul Stenquist or recently Dag Thrane post pictures of > their (grand)kids to this list - this is what I would call "sharing your > personal family joy with your friends". Some of you seen my children in > person and I hope more of you will. Then if I post Anat's or Galia's > photograph here (which I rarely do, but still) - it would be totally > (<-- I cannot possibly stress that word enough) different than posting > something like this lady did in FB for public consumption. Granted I > would use flickr or other such resource, but nonetheless my point is > that the internet is way over saturated with family album pictures posted > for general public. Personally, I think it is a bad thing. > > For example, now she's crying "wolf" because someone reported her pic as > child nudity or whatever. Now, may be she has to look in the mirror and > ask herself - "am I too exhibitionist?", "is it right to be so?". > Too exhibitionist for showing a picture of her daughter? That is called slut shaming (or victim blaming if you are sensitive), blaming the victim for acting outside your accepted norms. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
