Eric, I think it is a darn pleasing image, irregardless of the noise. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:48 PM, Doug Franklin <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Compared to what I usually get with high ISO, though…. >> >> Look at the sky and you'll see it. The complexity of the rest of the scene >> hides it. > > Eh? Just toss a little grain into the image and you'll never notice it. ];-) > > I think we've all become so marketing hyped and hypersensitive to noise that > everything people point to as the classic perfect modern image looks like > buffed and polished plastic to me. Which is why I'm stressing film, pushing > sensors to ridiculous levels with toy and glassless lenses on digital, etc > etc, to achieve something that is not buffed and polished plastic in my > renderings. Something that looks real, dammit. > > G > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
