On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

> 
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:15 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Wed Dec 21 20:57:48 EST 2011
>> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> 
>> On Dec 21, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> 
>>>> It's a "tragedy of the commons" thing. For each business it makes
>>>> economic sense to move aspects of production off shore to where
>>>> labor is cheaper. After a while, nobody is building anything in the
>>>> US anymore. Except for Toyota and Honda who now have some car plants
>>>> here. 
>> 
>>> Toyota and Honda plants are in right=to-work states. 
>> 
>> Paul, sorry, but I don't think you are correct in this statement.
>> 
>> At least according to this Wikipedia page, Honda's plants in the US
>> are in Alabama, Ohio and Indiana:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Honda_assembly_plants
>> According to this list:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-work_law
>> out of these three, only Alabama is a right-to-work state.
> 
> And how many plants in right to work states, do the companies that operate 
> under UAW contracts have? None.
>> 
>> According to this Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota ,
>> Toyota's six major assembly plants in the US are in 
>> Alabama (*), Kentucky, Indiana, Texas(*), West Virginia, and
>> Missisippi(*). Only 3 of these states (marked with "*") are
>> right-to-work states.
> 
> I didn't say all of their plants were in right to work states. Three plants 
> in right to work states gives them a huge advantage. What's more, some of the 
> plants that aren't in right to work states aren't unionized. 
>> 
>> Mitshubishi has its only plant in Normal, IL, which is not a RTW state
>> either.
>> 
>> Of all the major Japanese car manufacturers, only Nissan has its plants 
>> exclusively in RTW states (Tennessee and Mississippi).
>> 
>> So, while you are right about the disadvantages of the Big Three due to
>> the fact that they need to deal with UAW, I suspect that your statement 
>> is based on the legends spread by the US car manufacturers as an excuse 
>> for their bad management and historic inheritance (which is, in some
>> sense, is also a result of bad management).
>> 
> And huge pension obligations. Facts, not excuses.
> 
>> Igor
>> 

As an addendum, note that the Mitsubishi plant is UAW organized, because it was 
originally a joint venture of Chrysler and Mitsubishi. Mitsubishi has not been 
able to produce competitive products there on their own and are now a tiny 
presence in the U.S. market.

Paul

>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to