On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:15 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

> 
> Wed Dec 21 20:57:48 EST 2011
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> 
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> 
>>> It's a "tragedy of the commons" thing. For each business it makes
>>> economic sense to move aspects of production off shore to where
>>> labor is cheaper. After a while, nobody is building anything in the
>>> US anymore. Except for Toyota and Honda who now have some car plants
>>> here. 
> 
>> Toyota and Honda plants are in right=to-work states. 
> 
> Paul, sorry, but I don't think you are correct in this statement.
> 
> At least according to this Wikipedia page, Honda's plants in the US
> are in Alabama, Ohio and Indiana:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Honda_assembly_plants
> According to this list:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-work_law
> out of these three, only Alabama is a right-to-work state.

And how many plants in right to work states, do the companies that operate 
under UAW contracts have? None.
> 
> According to this Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota ,
> Toyota's six major assembly plants in the US are in 
> Alabama (*), Kentucky, Indiana, Texas(*), West Virginia, and
> Missisippi(*). Only 3 of these states (marked with "*") are
> right-to-work states.

I didn't say all of their plants were in right to work states. Three plants in 
right to work states gives them a huge advantage. What's more, some of the 
plants that aren't in right to work states aren't unionized. 
> 
> Mitshubishi has its only plant in Normal, IL, which is not a RTW state
> either.
> 
> Of all the major Japanese car manufacturers, only Nissan has its plants 
> exclusively in RTW states (Tennessee and Mississippi).
> 
> So, while you are right about the disadvantages of the Big Three due to
> the fact that they need to deal with UAW, I suspect that your statement 
> is based on the legends spread by the US car manufacturers as an excuse 
> for their bad management and historic inheritance (which is, in some
> sense, is also a result of bad management).
> 
And huge pension obligations. Facts, not excuses.

> Igor
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to