RS> good output. I have yet to purchase a Genuine Fractals product but I am now
RS> quite keen to experiment given some of the positive accounts by members of
RS> various photographic lists.
RS> Cheers,
RS> Rob Studdert
Rob,
I have so far used the GF PrintPro trial (it is perfectly
functional, but limited by a counter of 10 pictures only. Easily
reversible, but that is not on topic... I don't want to advocate
such things). I have used it only on two pictures from my 1.4MP
digicam to produce A4 (20x30cm) portraits on photographic paper
(through a Noritsu digilab). While from close viewing distance it
is visible that it's a digital image, it looks *quite* a lot better
than normally interpolated image. I have found out that it works
best with nature or city images (where there is enough small
detail). I think it's really worth trying the trial version and
printing the results along with normally uninterpolated image for
comparison. I found out that by careful unsharp masking of
SELECTED parts of the GF interpolated image, I could get even
better results (for some types of photographs only)
Frantisek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
