The conversion engine is identical between iPhoto and Aperture, and the backend is closely related. Aperture is really just a better UI with more control over editing on top of iPhoto's backend.
-Adam On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > IPhoto does a decent job. I fooled around with it a bit and was surprised as > well. I imagine it shares some conversion technology with Aperture. > Paul > On Apr 2, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Nick Wright wrote: > >> Thanks for all the replies. >> >> I've been fiddling around with several different programs. And I'll >> just have to decide. >> >> Frankly I've really been enjoying the look of the photos done by >> iPhoto. I'm really rather surprised by this in fact. >> >> I just downloaded Bibble and was struck by how much noise my sample >> photo at 3200 had when processed with Bibble. I pulled up the copy >> processed by iPhoto and you'd almost think it was shot with two >> different cameras. If only iPhoto would allow you to edit IPTC I'd be >> good to go. >> >> At this point I'm guessing that I'll just stick with iPhoto for the >> time being and save my pennies to get Aperture. The theory being that >> Aperture will process the photos the same way iPhoto does. I tried >> Aperture's demo several months ago so I can't play with these files >> now. >> >> Thanks again. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
