You're remarks, as usual, are rational and considerate to all views. If this were the case, both on and off list, this would be an even more pleasant place. If only everyone who invited critiques actually accepted them with your grace, and that of the vast majority of participants, this sort of ego combat wouldn't happen. My hope is that we can reduce these incidents by being more careful with our language to insure it is free of a condescending tone. I apologize for my contribution to the unpleasantness..truly!
Jack --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 11/8/2007 5:48:17 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Surprised you didn't recognize that it speaks to the discipline > disparity between styles. > You have to recognize that there is a different set of skills > attendant > to a varying array of styles. > Some subjects require more discipline in rendering an intended image > with the intended effect. > The relevance is that contrary to your message to Tom, all > photographers are NOT doing the same thing. > Seems clear to me. > > Jack > > ================= > Actually, I think they are, Jack. > > Different sets of skills does not necessarily mean that one set of > skills is > better than another set of skills. And the skills may be very > similar, more > similar than they appear. Godfrey is very careful in his > compositions when he > does minimalism. Tom seems to be equally careful in his compositions > when he > does landscapes. > > Having seen Godfrey's pictures in real life (not a minimalism show > -- > Britian after/before Isle of Man) I could tell he is very deliberate > in what he > does. I felt that show was excellent. He also shoots a wide variety > of things: > people, street scenes, and minimalism. > > I also don't believe Tom arrives at so many outstanding landscapes > by pure > happenstance either. It is not just due to where he lives. Many > could live in > the same beauty still not be able to produce so many good photos > from it. > Also his recent city scenes showed he carries the same skills over > to the urban > area. > > <Shrug> Different strokes for different folks, we don't all like the > same > things. For myself, I like a wide variety of photographic subjects > and styles. > > Personally, what I am impressed by most is by creativity then > craftsmanship. > > The trend of this thread disturbs me, and I hope it doesn't continue > to > degrade. > > ================= > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46c.htm > > Comments, critique, etc always appreciated. > > enjoy > Godfrey > > ================= > > I sort of like it, Godfrey, but something, the rendition, the > closeness, > almost makes it look over sharpened to my eye. I am sure it had that > texture, > but it almost looks overdone. Not sure I can explain what I mean. > > HTH, Marnie aka Doe > > > --------------------------------------------- > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > > > > ************************************** See what's new at > http://www.aol.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
