Frankly, Jack, I find your response a pile of uncompromising condescenion, pretension and pomposity. In more succinct terms, utter and total bullshit.
I tried to be polite in my prior response to you. Godfrey On Nov 8, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > Surprised you didn't recognize that it speaks to the discipline > disparity between styles. > You have to recognize that there is a different set of skills > attendant > to a varying array of styles. > Some subjects require more discipline in rendering an intended image > with the intended effect. > The relevance is that contrary to your message to Tom, all > photographers are NOT doing the same thing. > Seems clear to me. > > Jack > --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> An interesting statement but of absolutely no relevance to the >> question I posed to Tom. >> >> Godfrey >> >> On Nov 8, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >> >>> Landscape composition is everything. Weight and balance through a >>> mixture of size and tone are employed to please the eye. All >> elements >>> and their relationship to the others is critical. It is an >> intricate >>> assemblage that touches a sweet chord and imparts instant harmony. >>> The viewer thus enjoys the immediate impact of a clear message. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
