Bob W wrote: >Thanks. The Olympus lenses don't rotate, and nor do (most of?) my >Contax lenses, so I'm used to that. The mistake I make most often (and >this is not restricted to digital, obviously) is forgetting the filter >factor when I take a manual incident reading. > >-- > Bob > > > That's why God made "chimping" :)
ann > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>Behalf Of ann sanfedele >>Sent: 24 June 2007 15:33 >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Subject: Re: Polarisers and digital photography >> >>Yeah - remember the lens doesn't rotate - so you don't have >>to adjust >>the polarizer every time you re focus >>as long as your point of view is the same and the light >>doesn't change. >> I'm embarrassed to tell you how long >>it took me to figure that one out :) >> >>Hmmm I guess that wouldn't be true if you are using an old >>manual lens >>on the DSLR though. >> >>ann >> >>Bob W wrote: >> >> >> >>>I'm off to West Dorset tomorrow for another few days of >>> >>> >>pootling about >> >> >>>on my bike, doing day rides from a fixed point this time, and >>>returning on Friday. >>> >>>I'm going to take a polariser, probably. I haven't used a >>> >>> >>polariser in >> >> >>>digital photography before. Is there anything I particularly need >>> >>> >to > > >>>look out for, or be aware of? I use B+W and Contax circular >>>polarisers, which are neutral in colour and good quality, but if >>>there's anything intrinsically different about using them >>> >>> >>with digital >> >> >>>compared to film, please let me know. >>> >>>-- >>>Thanks, >>>Bob >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>PDML@pdml.net >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
