Thanks. That's what I had in mind too, also needing to bring the sky in a bit sometimes. Unfortunately though it looks as if it's going to rain heavily on me all week, so the polariser may be just dead weight.
-- Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Peter Lacus > Sent: 24 June 2007 12:37 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Polarisers and digital photography > > Bob, > > > I'm going to take a polariser, probably. I haven't used a > polariser in > > digital photography before. Is there anything I particularly need to > > look out for, or be aware of? I use B+W and Contax circular > > polarisers, which are neutral in colour and good quality, but if > > there's anything intrinsically different about using them > with digital > > compared to film, please let me know. > > polariser is as useful on digital as ever. Most of my pictures of NZ > were taken with B+W MRC circular polariser and I haven't noticed any > adverse effects. And the polariser enabled me to take some pictures > which would be impossible to take otherwise, like: > > http://picasaweb.google.com/placus/NewZealand/photo#5079591291 > 629615122 > > Perhaps not a typical case for using a polariser, but without > it almost > whole surface of the lake turned to washed out white. > Polariser helped > to restore at least some of the details... > > Cheers, > > Peter > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
