I don't think Pentax is unable to market, I think they just don't want the expense, and that is part of the reason they are reletively inexpensive. If I was to charactorize Pentax SLRs today I would say they are aimed at 100% of a nitch market rather than at 2% of the mainstream market. P�l Jensen wrote: > > Yes. However, the main problem is that Pentax is unable to market anything and due >to their rather weak image their products really need pushing. -- Tom "Graywolf" Rittenhouse Graywolf Photo, Charlotte, NC, USA ------------------------------------------ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK review) Jim Brooks
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK re... Terence Mac Goff
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first U... P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (fir... Bucky
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (fir... Bucky
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer ... P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer ... Doug Franklin
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photogra... Peter Alling
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer ... Jim Moniz
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (fir... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first U... Tom Rittenhouse
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK re... Rob Brigham
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK re... Rfsindg
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK re... Jim Brooks
- RE: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK re... Cotty
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first U... Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (fir... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Digital (was Re: MZ-S review in Amat... Doctor Digi
- Re: Digital (was Re: MZ-S review in Amat... Mark D.
- Digital weddings - or why I want a full-... John Mustarde

