----- Original Message ----- From: "Frantisek"
Subject: Re: P67 vs D1s -- photo.net
WR> If it's the Takumar 200/4, it is a very pedestrian lens.
WR> I have heard the SMC 200/4 is better, but still not really good.
WR> OTOH, I expect the EF100/2.8 macro is one of Canon's better lenses.
WR> He should have chosen the EF50/1.7 and the SMCP 105/2.4 for his test.
WR> And he should have gotten a high end optical print made from the
WR> film, rather than a scan.
Another apples vs oranges comparison on photo.net ...
I realize it is pretty hard to do a legitimate comparison of film to digital, but they could try a little harder than that.
That one fell into the sky is pink category.
William Robb
