----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: Re: P67 vs D1s -- photo.net
http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation?presentation_id=267479
Hmm, pics or comments didn't do too much for me, again a strange comparison. If
it shows me anything it is that the 200/4 for the P67 is a pretty poor
performer, CA is really pronounced.
If it's the Takumar 200/4, it is a very pedestrian lens.
I have heard the SMC 200/4 is better, but still not really good.
OTOH, I expect the EF100/2.8 macro is one of Canon's better lenses.
He should have chosen the EF50/1.7 and the SMCP 105/2.4 for his test.
And he should have gotten a high end optical print made from the film, rather than a scan.
William Robb
