WR> If it's the Takumar 200/4, it is a very pedestrian lens. WR> I have heard the SMC 200/4 is better, but still not really good. WR> OTOH, I expect the EF100/2.8 macro is one of Canon's better lenses. WR> He should have chosen the EF50/1.7 and the SMCP 105/2.4 for his test. WR> And he should have gotten a high end optical print made from the WR> film, rather than a scan.
Another apples vs oranges comparison on photo.net ...
Good light!
fra
