AF140C seems fine. I haven't had any problems with the AF360FTZ either, although it's
not quite as good as with the MZ-S. Not used it as much yet though.
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: "Joseph Tainter"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 18/05/04 01:30:15
To: "pdml"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Further Adventures with *ist D Flash
First I tried it with the AF 400T. Here's the results:
Normal direct TTL, definitely overexposed.
-1/2 EV, better but still overexposed
-1.0 EV, better still
Ceiling bounce: overall exposure is better, nearly okay.
Vivitar 6000 AF Macro Flash: All TTL exposures so far seem fine.
All tests were done at ISO 200.
I am disappointed with the performance of the AF 400T because I like
this flash. Bruce Dayton reports good performance with it on the *ist D.
Bruce, what am I doing wrong?
Has anyone gotten consistently good TTL results with any flash on the
*ist D? I am in the market, but hate to spend money on something that
may not give reliable results.
Thanks,
Joe
