Well, I'm not saying that one is better than another, but it seems that there may some situations that manual focus is faster and more accurate (or at least there's a better chance that it will be more accurate) than AF. It ~may~ be that in the majority of situations, AF works best (and fastest).
Maybe your analogy would be better if it related to technology, such as bicycles and cars. Sometimes the bicycle, despite being the older, simpler technology, works better for the purpose at hand, is more reliable, and is faster (like in a traffic jam). But, there's no doubt that in the majority of situations, the car works best. regards, frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You weren't born knowing how to walk either. Do you also crawl around, because > walking is too slow when you don't know how to do it? > > BR > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >This is why I never bothered to buy an AF camera, it's too slow. > > __________________________________________________________________ > McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network. > Comprehensive protection for your entire computer. Get your free trial today! > http://channels.netscape.com/ns/computing/mcafee/index.jsp?promo=393397 > > Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge. Download Now! > http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455 -- "I don't believe in God, but I do believe in pi" - Henri Cartier-Bresson
