here here...

Cheers

Shaun

Mike Johnston wrote:
After reading the ist D threads over the last couple of days it looks now
like the honeymoon is over, the bitching & moaning has begun in
earnest.  PDML negative imagination is running amuck and more than a few of
us, who previously were pleading for Pentax to release the new DSLR, now
have the ist D lying dead in a pile of ashes before too long.  All of this
based on a couple of photos of a prototype camera that no one has even
handled.  Yes sir, all is right in the Pentax world!


Perhaps, perhaps...

Personally, and I say this with the weight of my reputation behind me, I
think the *ist D is about the perfect product introduction at this point in
time. Much remains to be seen, of course, in the way of image quality and
firmware choices and camera performance; but as regards the good looks of
the camera, the incredible size, and all of the apparent design choices
evident from this early, partial release of the specifications, I truly
believe that there is not one thing that Pentax could have done better.

To me, this product looks well conceived, well judged, well designed,
astutely implemented, and beautifully balanced, and so far I can't identify
any significant flaws. I think the Pentax team that put this together did an
outstandingly good job.

--Mike



Mike Johnston
________

See "The Sunday Morning Photographer," my weekly online column about
photography at any of these three locations:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sunday1.shtml

http://www.steves-digicams.com/smp/smp_index.html

http://www.photo.net/mjohnston/


Also, check out my regular monthly column in the U.K. _Black & White Photography_ magazine!

.



--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shaun Canning                                                           
Cultural Heritage Services                                              
High Street, Broadford,
Victoria, 3658.

www.heritageservices.com.au/

Phone: 0414-967644
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++





Reply via email to