Dear all,
I generally agree with Mike's argument that pixel count isn't everything.
But he did miss the following points:
1. Higher pixel count will likely to enhance the colour accuracy of the
current RGB mosaic type CCD sensors. More pixel will increase the
information available for interpolation calculations.
2. Higher pixel count will enable greater flexibility for cropping.
I believe that there is an optimal size of an image sensor which a balance
must be strike between the resolution, greater choice of DOF, optimal design
for both wide-angle and telephoto lenses, and the compactness of camera
body. Eventually, digital camera will evolve into an optimal design, like
film sizes in traditional film camera. In the traditional film, 35mm format
is the most balanced design. If one want to go for better quality, you can
have 645 or 67, while for more compactness we have the APS format. But 35mm
format is still the most popular. Digital evolution will be the same.
There is nothing to do with the pixel count.
Regards,
Henry Chu
20/1/2003
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday David Brooks
- OT: Old Digital WAS: RE: Mike Johnson's Sunday David Chang-Sang
- Re[2]: Mike Johnson's Sunday Iren & Henry Chu
- Re[2]: Mike Johnson's Sunday Alin Flaider
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday Mike Johnston
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday Bill Owens
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday Peter Alling
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday Peter Alling
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday T Rittenhouse
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday Peter Alling
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday P�l Jensen
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday Iren & Henry Chu
- Re: Mike Johnson's Sunday gfen

