Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >It still doesn't account for the fact that he's had to shell out the $2000 USD plus storage etc. to get 16 shots (and then more) instead of paying $20 for 16 shots each time. You can't say someone is "saving" when they in fact have to shell out cash to buy something - that's part of the problem with our consumer based society - we've been duped into believing we're actually "saving" money by purchasing something we don't necessarily need. We may want it but we don't _need_ it.<
suppose Tom knows he's going to shoot 20,000 pictures next year no matter what camera he has. the one with no consumable cost is going to have to be a lot more expensive, even including support peripherals and time, to make up for the one with a fixed consumable cost. Herb....
