Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >The concept of "saving" money by having to outlay more money always perplexed me. I'm as guilty of thinking about things this way as anyone else.
The problem is, Tom has to fork out $2000 USD to get the Nikon in order to, potentially, (assuming he continues to shoot at the rate he does) not have to buy film further down the road. Where is he "saving"? (i.e. how much moolah has he been able to stock away by having to outlay $2000)< because he has to take the pictures no matter what. Herb....
