On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Gerald Cermak wrote: > I ran across this one as a cheap (< $200) 1800 dpi 35mm film scanner. At a > full 36-bits with twain, it might work as an interim scanning solution for > me until the Nikon 8000 is released later in the spring. > > Has anyone used it? Got any opinions on it? I've seen it, but I've never used it. It's definitely lacking in terms of build quality, and the resolution is pretty low, but it struck me as a serviceable scanner for its price. Personally I'd just wait for the Nikon, if you're inclined that way. $200, however cheap for a neg/slide scanner, is a lot to spend on a purely interim solution. chris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film 1800U sc... Gerald Cermak
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... Colin & Linda McKie
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-... Chris Brogden
- !!OT!!Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Im... Colin & Linda McKie
- Re: (HP adapter) Anyone using the... Paul Jones
- Re: (HP adapter) Anyone usin... Peter Alling
- Re: (HP adapter) Anyone usin... Flavio Minelli
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Pr... Colin & Linda McKie
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Imag... Gerald Cermak
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... Chris Brogden
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... JeffW.
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... Paul Jones
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-... Leon Altoff
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... aimcompute
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... aimcompute
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... aimcompute
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-... Gerald Cermak

