Shel wrote:
> Further, I believe the K-mount Takumars were built to the same
> quality standards as their SMCP brothers, and it was just the
> absence of the SMC that was the main difference and allowed
> Pentax to keep the prices down. IOW, the barrels, mounts,
:^) I've got a 28-80 Takumar A Zoom I'll sell ya so you
can test that theory out if you like.
!8^D
---------------------------------------------------------
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
- Re: SMC FA 24-90 Juan J. Buhler
- Re: SMC FA 24-90 Chris Brogden
- Re: SMC FA 24-90 Chris Brogden
- Re: SMC FA 24-90 Alan Chan
- Help Me Identify This SETH
- Re: Help Me Identify This Chris Brogden
- Re: Help Me Identify This Todd Stanley
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precision? Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precisio... Doug Brewer
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Prec... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech ... Bill D. Casselberry
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech ... Rob Studdert
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech ... Doug Brewer
- Re[2]: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Preci... Bob Walkden
- Re: Plastic Crap Lenses or High-Tech Precisio... Doug Brewer
- Re: SMC FA 24-90 Rob Studdert

