Hi WG, As co-author, I support the adoption of this draft.
It helps to clarify several PCEP aspects that might lead to better interoperability among implementations. I am willing to work on this draft. Cheers. Diego. From: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> Date: Monday, March 31, 2025 at 02:16 To: pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org> Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>, draft-koldychev-pce-operatio...@ietf.org <draft-koldychev-pce-operatio...@ietf.org> Subject: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-operational-09 CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-operational-09 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-koldychev-pce-operational/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 14th April 2025. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
