I support this ID as a co-author.

This ID was motivated by inter-op issues experienced at several EANTC events in 
the past.

Thanks,
Siva

From: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com<mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 11:15 AM
To: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org>>; 
draft-koldychev-pce-operatio...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-koldychev-pce-operatio...@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-operational-09

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-operational-09

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-koldychev-pce-operational/ 
[datatracker.ietf.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-koldychev-pce-operational/__;!!OSsGDw!JkimQXudbKuncpTWDmpfnp0afgMpA5ey8RI6pi9ShUK3b1HoXFCO5NBQ_O3kWEfI0cp6BUEA46I$>

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / 
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to 
work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 14th April 2025.

Please be more vocal during WG polls!

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to