Hi all,
I support adoption of this draft.
It has added value as it is explaining more complex scenarios, which may not be
obvious after reading existing PCEP WG RFCs/drafts. I personally used it a few
times already when I was trying to explain existing PCEP behavior in some
discussions.
Some comments to think about (non-blocking, so can be handled after adoption as
well).
* Consider expanding abstract and introduction, those are practically empty
now
* In terminology:
* "Make-Before-Break" - consider using more formal description do no to
use terms like "head-end ... wishing to move", e.g. checked MBB description in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3209#section-2.5
* "Association information" - does not seem to be used in the draft
* Section 4 - consider moving LSP definition to terminology - I assume that
definition is applicable to complete document and not just to that section with
sub-sections.
* Section 5.1 -replace "NOT REQUIRED" with lowercase, that does not seem to
be part of terms listed in "Requirements Language"
* Section 5.2 - maybe consider adding more details for impact on existing
association types and how PCE should handle them - e.g. for diversity
association in case of MBB and single association having more than 3 or more
LSPs
* Section 6 - is this section really just about computation constraints (as
suggested by title of the section) or about any LSP attribute?
Thanks a lot,
Samuel
From: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 11:15 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>; draft-koldychev-pce-operatio...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-operational-09
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-operational-09
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-koldychev-pce-operational/
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why /
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to
work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.
Please respond by Monday 14th April 2025.
Please be more vocal during WG polls!
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
