same here please. Simon
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona" <hank.smith...@gmail.com> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2015 4:39 AM Subject: Re: The new version of winamp Hello I to would like the hot key file as well Hank On 12/25/2015 9:21 PM, Casey wrote: > Hi are you willing to share you hot keys file for foobar? > So those of us that would like to try it and are not to formaulaer on > how to set the short cut keys for play and stop and so on can load in > your key file and start using it. > > > > On 12/24/2015 12:54 AM, Brett Boyer wrote: >> All I can say is foobar 2000. >> Yes you have to set it up yourself but once you do it is so >> customizable that it can beat anything winamp can do. In fact, you >> can manage multiple playlists at the same time, copy files from >> windows explorer, and make your won hot keys for every single command >> in the program including menu bar, context menus, now-playing context >> menus, and many many more. >> Here is an article >> I have been a foobar user for over 4 years. >> And yes, I still have winamp on my machine and use it form time to >> time, probably because old habbits die hard. But if I have to do >> anything for my radio show, or out in my living room where I have tv >> shows, music, my Howard Stern live streams, karaoke files, and a >> playlist for when particular guests are over. I can do all of this >> inside of foobar without having to load playlists over and over. >> The beauty part is managing multiple playlists in a tab style that >> makes my life a lot easier. >> Good luck to you though. >> If you do find the article of interest, since it's written for the >> general community I'd be happy to help you out figuring out >> accessible ways of doing things that the article doesn't cover. >> http://winamp2foobar.blogspot.com/ >> I hope you find what you're looking for! >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >> Barry Chapman >> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 6:03 PM >> To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> >> Subject: RE: The new version of winamp >> >> Well whether Winamp is the best or not is a matter of opinion, but I >> can say that I don't know of any other player which has all of the >> features that I use on a regular basis. Just a few that come to mind >> are: >> >> 1. Ability to play, pause, stop go back a track and go forward a >> track with one finger of my left hand. This is important to me when I >> use Winamp to stream and need to use my right hand to control my mixer. >> >> 2. The ability to move forward and back in five second increments >> with one finger. >> >> 3. An option to stop playing after the current track in a playlist. >> >> 4. The ability to locate a track in Windows explorer and add it to >> the Winamp playlist, either after the currently playing track or at >> the end of the playlist. >> >> 5. The ability to search for a track in a playlist and move it to >> after the currently playing track. >> >> 6. The ability to delete tracks from a playlist. >> >> 7. The ability to save a modified playlist. >> >> 8. The ability to cross fade tracks with a configurable plugin. >> >> 9. The ability to equalise the volume of all playing tracks with a >> configurable plugin. >> >> 10. The ability to have title information show up in Edcast when >> streaming. >> >> 11. The ability to find the length of a track in time as well as >> being able to find out the elapsed time and time remaining of a >> currently playing track. >> >> 12. The ability to select a sound card other than the default for the >> output. >> >> 13. The ability to edit and modify ID3 tags in MP3 files. >> >> 14. The ability to review tracks in a playlist by arrowing up and down. >> >> 15. The ability to search a playlist for tracks containing key words. >> >> 16. The ability to press enter on a track in Windows Explorer and >> have it start playing without the focus moving from Windows Explorer. >> >> 17. The ability to set a placemarker in a file when using JAWS. >> >> 18. The ability to set bookmarks for streams. >> >> 19. The ability to play a wide range of audio formats. >> >> 20. The ability to jump to a specific time in a track. >> >> 21. The ability to play the last few seconds of a track (possibly a >> JAWS feature). >> >> 22. The ability to easily get information about streams and tracks, >> such as the bit rate. >> >> I'm sure there are other features that don't come to mind >> immediately. If Dane or anyone else can tell me of another free or >> low cost player which they know will doo all of the above as well or >> better than Winamp, I would be willing to give it a try. >> >> Thanks, >> Barry Chapman >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >> Dane Trethowan >> Sent: Thursday, 24 December 2015 12:01 PM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> >> Subject: Re: The new version of winamp >> >> Well it won’t be the worlds best media player if its not accessible >> will it <smile> and there are plenty of people who would dispute your >> generalisation regarding Winamp being the World’s best media player. >> >> >>> On 24 Dec 2015, at 11:44 AM, Brian <n8...@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> Winamp will always be the best player for screen reader users and >>> keyboard users so you are a very big lier. if the new winamp is >>> better and still accessable I would conciter using it but if not I >>> will just keep using version 5.66 Brian Sackrider >>> >>> On 12/23/2015 4:45 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote: >>>> Don’t care any more as there are so many good alternatives anyway, >>>> the best thing that every happened in the media player world was >>>> the announcement made that development would cease on Winamp and as >>>> yet I’ve not heard any convincing reason as to why anyone should >>>> mourn the loss of this software. >>>> >>>> If a new company has taken Winamp over and development has started >>>> again then all well and good but I do think the player became far >>>> too bloated is is very much over rated. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 24 Dec 2015, at 8:16 AM, Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona >>>>> <hank.smith...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> its about time they released it >>>>> had no idea that they released a new version >>>>> >>>>> On 12/23/2015 2:12 PM, Larry Higgins wrote: >>>>>> Hello listers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Just wanted to know if any of you have used the latest version of >>>>>> Winamp from Radionomy? If so, how accessible is it with screen >>>>>> readers? I found out that the there is apparently only two >>>>>> versions, pro and light, and the pro is around $19.00. >>>>>> >>>>>> I might consider springing for the Pro version if I knew that it >>>>>> was actually worth it, or maybe another way of putting it, if it >>>>>> wouldn't break all of my presets and WE scripts/apps. I'd far >>>>>> rather use the old version for as long as I can, rather than >>>>>> destroying a perfectly working Winamp listening environment. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> ********** >>>> Those of a positive and enquiring frame of mind will leave the rest >>>> of the halfwits in this world behind. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> ********** >> Those of a positive and enquiring frame of mind will leave the rest >> of the halfwits in this world behind. >> >> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> >> >> >> >> >
