I agree, much better than others.
From: Brian
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:44 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The new version of winamp
Winamp will always be the best player for screen reader users and
keyboard users so you are a very big lier. if the new winamp is better
and still accessable I would conciter using it but if not I will just
keep using version 5.66
Brian Sackrider
On 12/23/2015 4:45 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
> Don’t care any more as there are so many good alternatives anyway, the best
> thing that every happened in the media player world was the announcement made
> that development would cease on Winamp and as yet I’ve not heard any
> convincing reason as to why anyone should mourn the loss of this software.
>
> If a new company has taken Winamp over and development has started again then
> all well and good but I do think the player became far too bloated is is very
> much over rated.
>
>
>> On 24 Dec 2015, at 8:16 AM, Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona
>> <hank.smith...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> its about time they released it
>> had no idea that they released a new version
>>
>> On 12/23/2015 2:12 PM, Larry Higgins wrote:
>>> Hello listers,
>>>
>>> Just wanted to know if any of you have used the latest version of Winamp
>>> from Radionomy? If so, how accessible is it with screen readers? I found
>>> out that the there is apparently only two versions, pro and light, and the
>>> pro is around $19.00.
>>>
>>> I might consider springing for the Pro version if I knew that it was
>>> actually worth it, or maybe another way of putting it, if it wouldn't break
>>> all of my presets and WE scripts/apps. I'd far rather use the old version
>>> for as long as I can, rather than destroying a perfectly working Winamp
>>> listening environment.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> **********
> Those of a positive and enquiring frame of mind will leave the rest of the
> halfwits in this world behind.
>
>
>
>
