I think what he is asking is what good is a good quality job if you can't 
access it without sighted help?
****
If we can't look at ourselves, and ask, why?  then where does the learning 
start?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dane Trethowan" <grtd...@internode.on.net>
To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:00 AM
Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder


So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that what 
your'e saying?

On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon <sca...@tpg.com.au> wrote:

> For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg compare 
> with the ideal keyboard access to SF.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Dane Trethowan
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
>
> That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I 
> work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you told 
> them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration work, 
> they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a 
> professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the 
> Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, 
> again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder.
>
>
> On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly <otrja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration 
>> with
>> old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible 
>> out
>> of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works 
>> best
>> with JFW scripts if you use Jaws.
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane
>> Trethowan
>> Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
>>
>> Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with
>> accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely
>> accessible.
>>
>> the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that
>> yesterday.
>>
>> Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I
>> haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect 
>> it
>> does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the
>> navigation by sentence, paragraph etc.
>>
>>
>> On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer <al.gruena...@gmx.de> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dane,
>>>
>>> Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder
>> compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge?
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>
>>> Alexandra
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dane Trethowan"
>> <grtd...@internode.on.net>
>>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
>>>
>>>
>>> At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth
>> without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I 
>> don't
>> lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no 
>> "Save
>> As Dialogue" box.
>>>
>>> Will be purchasing on Thursday.
>>>
>>> On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer <al.gruena...@gmx.de>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days.
>>>>
>>>> Alexandra
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris H" <christopher...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing 
>>>>> one
>> to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it.
>>>>> Regards Chris
>>>>> On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote:
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy 
>>>>>> later
>>>>>> in the month.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software
>> having
>>>>>> limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go
>>>>>> beynd the bounds of common sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so
>> far
>>>>>> so good but the problem is that the "Save As" dialogue box is also
>>>>>> disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to
>>>>>> export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder
>> manual,
>>>>>> a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can
>> be
>>>>>> rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> **********
>>>
>>> Dane Trethowan
>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> **********
>>
>> Dane Trethowan
>> Skype: grtdane12
>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>> Mobile: +61400494862
>> Fax +61397437954
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> **********
>
> Dane Trethowan
> Skype: grtdane12
> Phone US (213) 438-9741
> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
> Mobile: +61400494862
> Fax +61397437954
>
>
>


**********

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
Fax +61397437954





Reply via email to