thanks, people speak very highly of the company, how did you find the software?

On 11 Feb 2014, at 11:02 pm, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:

> Its about $4-500 new -- I bought it many years ago and kept upgrading
> the thing.  Version 6 first started the dongle and version 7 and onward
> is available for both Windows and the Mac.  I tried version 8 on Windows
> 8 briefly, but got no place at all, and now I am not allowed to try the
> Mac one.  Even the upgrade price is $200 or thereabouts.
> 
> Dane Trethowan <grtd...@internode.on.net> wrote:
> 
>> Interesting, I've just looked Wavelab up with Google, can't find a purchase 
>> price right at the moment, I notice there's a Mac OSX version so my 
>> attention has been drawn to that.
>> 
>> 
>> On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:15 pm, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>> 
>>> I use wavelab by Steinberg and version 6 is barely accessible, but so
>>> much better than anything else that I use it.  Versions beyond 6 were
>>> written with some kind of cross platform library which seems not to be
>>> accessible at all.  It also requires a dongle to use it at all.
>>> 
>>> Dane Trethowan <grtd...@internode.on.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> So accessibility is far more important than a good quality job, is that 
>>>> what your'e saying?
>>>> 
>>>> On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:49 pm, Peter Scanlon <sca...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> For us accessability is most important, so how does that Steinberg 
>>>>> compare with the ideal keyboard access to SF.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Dane Trethowan
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:41 PM
>>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>>>> Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's a very subjective comment regarding Sound Forge, I know people I 
>>>>> work with who would have split and sore sides for a whole week if you 
>>>>> told them that Sound Forge was an ideal piece of software for restoration 
>>>>> work, they use something call StineBerg I think its called and they run a 
>>>>> professional Audio/Video restoration business, according to them the 
>>>>> Restoration plugins in SF are well over rated as is the software itself, 
>>>>> again its a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 11 Feb 2014, at 9:38 pm, Jamie Kelly <otrja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I use both programs. SF is ideal if you are doing any audio restoration 
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> old tapes and records whereas SR all the functions are very accessible 
>>>>>> out
>>>>>> of the box and you just want straight recording/editing tools. SF works 
>>>>>> best
>>>>>> with JFW scripts if you use Jaws.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jamie
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane
>>>>>> Trethowan
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2014 5:21 PM
>>>>>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Firstly, its cheaper than Sound Forge Pro and its been designed with
>>>>>> accessibility in mind thus has a full feature set which is entirely
>>>>>> accessible.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> the manual is well laid out and easy to get to, I sent a link to that
>>>>>> yesterday.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Editing/navigating keystrokes are straight forward and easy to use, I
>>>>>> haven't found out yet whether it handles Daisy recordings but I suspect 
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> does given that Studio Recorder has a navigation menu which allows the
>>>>>> navigation by sentence, paragraph etc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 11 Feb 2014, at 5:13 pm, Alexandra Grünauer <al.gruena...@gmx.de> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Dane,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Would you be so kind as to explain the advantages of Studio Recorder
>>>>>> compaired to other audio programmes like Sound Forge?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Alexandra
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dane Trethowan"
>>>>>> <grtd...@internode.on.net>
>>>>>>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:17 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> At least all the functions work, I mean I can edit, record and so forth
>>>>>> without any problems and as long as I keep the application open then I 
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> lose any of my work so its not a huge issue, just unexpected to see no 
>>>>>> "Save
>>>>>> As Dialogue" box.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Will be purchasing on Thursday.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 11 Feb 2014, at 3:57 am, Alexandra Grünauer <al.gruena...@gmx.de>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> or they could produce a full version that works for, say, thirty days.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Alexandra
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris H" <christopher...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:42 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Demo Of Studio Recorder
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Why not contact APH and let them know. Surely it's no harm allowing 
>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>> to view a dialogue box but not be able to take action with it.
>>>>>>>>> Regards Chris
>>>>>>>>> On 10/02/2014 05:03, Dane Trethowan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm using the demo of studio recorder, I plan to buy my own copy 
>>>>>>>>>> later
>>>>>>>>>> in the month.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I don't have any problems with a demo copy of a piece of software
>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>>> limitations but some limitations in some pieces of software just go
>>>>>>>>>> beynd the bounds of common sense.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> In Studio Recorder the exporting and saving of files is disabled, so
>>>>>> far
>>>>>>>>>> so good but the problem is that the "Save As" dialogue box is also
>>>>>>>>>> disabled thus you have no idea what formats are available for you to
>>>>>>>>>> export or save to unless you rummage through the Studio Recorder
>>>>>> manual,
>>>>>>>>>> a very bad oversight on behalf of the developers and perhaps this can
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> rectified in future demo editions of the Studio Recorder application.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> **********
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> **********
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> **********
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> **********
>>>> 
>>>> Dane Trethowan
>>>> Skype: grtdane12
>>>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>>>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>>>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>>>> Mobile: +61400494862
>>>> Fax +61397437954
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
>>> How do
>>> you spend it?
>>> 
>>>        John Covici
>>>        cov...@ccs.covici.com
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> **********
>> 
>> Dane Trethowan
>> Skype: grtdane12
>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>> Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>> Mobile: +61400494862
>> Fax +61397437954
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
> How do
> you spend it?
> 
>         John Covici
>         cov...@ccs.covici.com
> 


**********

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
Fax +61397437954



Reply via email to