https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2431593
--- Comment #13 from Yaakov Selkowitz <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Sergio Arroutbi from comment #12) > https://github.com/latchset/clevis-pin-trustee/tree/main/LICENSES CC0-1.0 is actually problematic for *code*, but inspection of the source tree shows that it is only used in the build infrastructure (Cargo.toml, test.sh, etc.). Per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_source_package_files_not_included_in_binary_rpm , as these files do not end up in the binary RPMs, their license should be omitted. Therefore, CC0-1.0 should not be in the License tag nor installed by %license in %files. > > %cargo_summary doesn't belong in %install, and there is no need for two > > calls. The existing call in %build should be CHANGED per my previous > > comments. Also, both %cargo_license_summary and %cargo_license should > > FOLLOW %cargo_build, not precede it. > > I have no %cargo_summary in my .spec file. Do you mean > %cargo_license_summary? > In that case, it is only being called once. Sorry, I meant %cargo_license, there should be only call in %build, bracketed and redirected. > +License: BSD-3-Clause AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016 > AND (0BSD OR MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Apache-2.0 AND (Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0) > AND (BSD-2-Clause OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND MIT AND (MIT OR Zlib OR > Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-3.0 AND (Unlicense OR MIT) AND CC0-1.0 Besides dropping CC0-1.0 as mentioned above, the "AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0)" clause isn't needed for the same reason "(Apache-2.0 OR MIT)" isn't -- both Apache-2.0 and MIT are already AND'ed in by themselves. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2431593 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202431593%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
