https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2414840
--- Comment #10 from Phil Wyett <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #9) > I can’t find this written down anywhere, but I think that in cases of > duplicate review requests for the same package, the earlier one should take > priority. In this case, that would be bug 1187030. This review request could > be considered if the previous one becomes stalled > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_review_policy/#stalled) > or by agreement with the previous submitter. The ticket listed has had no activity since April of this year and dates back to 2015. I am packaging giza as a build dependency for splash[1] which I am preparing now, a widely used astronomy tool. I will maintain and keep both up to date within fedora and EPEL. [1] https://github.com/danieljprice/splash -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2414840 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202414840%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
