https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2414840
--- Comment #5 from Phil Wyett <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #3) > Is there a specific technical requirement for the static library? If so, it > would be helpful to justify packaging the static library in a spec-file > comment, since we avoid packaging those whenever possible: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static- > libraries Ben, Thanks, I am now too used to creating static packages for Debian and have to get back to that they are not wanted unless for good reason. Below is new SPEC and SRPM disabling static lib build and removing associated RPMS. Spec URL: https://kathenas.fedorapeople.org/development/fedora/rawhide/for_review/giza.spec SRPM URL: https://kathenas.fedorapeople.org/development/fedora/rawhide/for_review/giza-1.5.0-1.el9.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2414840 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202414840%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
