On 2011-05-13T08:54:19, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
> > No. Because starting/acquiring the resources would still depend on a
> > "local" fence of the other side. This is protected against by our
> > regular dependencies already.
> >
> > Or am I missing something still?
> Possibly.
> Couldn't both sides start shooting each other until one looses the token?
Not more than before, though I'd expect a side that freshly rebooted to
come up w/o any token.
In general, the possibility for a fencing deathmatch is not different
than before, though.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
