On 2011-05-03T08:28:06, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
Sorry for the late reply. I missed that there actually was one open
detail still.
> >> Question though... what about no-quorum-policy=ignore ?
> > That was implicit somewhere later on, I think. The CTR must be able to
> > cope with multiple partitions of the same site, and would only grant the
> > T to one of them.
> But you'll still have a (longer) time when both partitions will think
> they own the token.
> Potentially long enough to begin starting resources.
No. Because starting/acquiring the resources would still depend on a
"local" fence of the other side. This is protected against by our
regular dependencies already.
Or am I missing something still?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
