On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@suse.de> wrote: > On 2011-05-03T08:28:06, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > > Sorry for the late reply. I missed that there actually was one open > detail still. > >> >> Question though... what about no-quorum-policy=ignore ? >> > That was implicit somewhere later on, I think. The CTR must be able to >> > cope with multiple partitions of the same site, and would only grant the >> > T to one of them. >> But you'll still have a (longer) time when both partitions will think >> they own the token. >> Potentially long enough to begin starting resources. > > No. Because starting/acquiring the resources would still depend on a > "local" fence of the other side. This is protected against by our > regular dependencies already. > > Or am I missing something still?
Possibly. Couldn't both sides start shooting each other until one looses the token? > > > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
