Hello, Bob, On 10/04/2017 06:38 PM, Bob Hinden wrote: > > I also don’t think this is ready for a w.g. last call. > > It doesn’t reference the new version of the IPv6 specification > RFC8200. There were a number of clarifications in RFC8200 regarding > extension headers that may require changes in the draft.
We talked a bit about this. Best option seems to be to keep the current text and add text regarding the changes in RFC8200 -- at the end of th day, an operator will have to deal with both RFC2460 and RFC8200 implementations. Thoughts? Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
