On 9/29/2017 1:12 AM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: > > This is to open a two week WGLC > for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-03. >
I do not agree with the claims of this document. It "informationally" advises against support for key IPv6 capabilities and undermines the extensibility of IPv6 by making recommendations about discarding currently unassigned codepoints. This is an overstep for an OPS group, IMO. Additionally, it refers to RFC2119 without taking care to capitalize those keywords where used or to provide specific examples where recommendations contradict existing Internet standards or are not definitive (e.g., SHOULDs). I don't think this document is ready in any way. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
