On 08/02/2015 13:55, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Feb 7, 2015, at 7:00 PM, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> > wrote: >> However, I don't think you should remove this sentence and the normative >> reference >> to RFC 7045: >> >> [RFC7045] requires that nodes be >> configurable with respect to whether packets with unrecognized >> headers are forwarded, and allows the default behavior to be >> that such packets be dropped. > > What does that have to do with DHCPv6 shield? I guess I don't mind if this > is included, but it seems unnecessary.
DHCPv6 Shield matches the definition of "forwarding node" given in RFC 7045, so reminding implementers of the requirement seems appropriate to me. Brian _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
