On Feb 7, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason for this is that we can safely assume that any IP extension > header that appears in a packet conforms to RFC 6564.
What I mean here is that any IP extension header not already standardized at the time of publication of this document, which presumably any implementation conforming to this document will be aware of. Of course there are IP extension headers already defined that do not conform to RFC 6564. _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
