On 08/02/2015 09:37, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Feb 7, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote: >> Right one would expect future extension headers to match the TLV >> expectations of 6564. I can live with the removal of filtering advice but >> I'd like to see that run past the working group at the very least. > > Sounds like a good plan. Thanks!
However, I don't think you should remove this sentence and the normative reference to RFC 7045: [RFC7045] requires that nodes be configurable with respect to whether packets with unrecognized headers are forwarded, and allows the default behavior to be that such packets be dropped. Brian _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
