We are officially closing out this WGLC. It looks like both drafts have been updated to address comments, and we are close to being able to push these to the IESG.
That said, Med is the shepherd on T+/TLS, and I think he wants to hand that off so he can ballot on this. I offered to take that role as I am the shepherd on the YANG draft. Additionally, we’d like to ask Russ and Yingzhen to amend their DIR reviews so we have a full green light. Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> Date: Thursday, March 6, 2025 at 08:48 To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: WG LC: TACACS+ TLS and its YANG module (draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13 & draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang) Hello, WG! With the IPR polls concluded (no IPR has yet been disclosed), the authors feel that these two drafts are ready. Therefore, we are kicking off a three-week combined WG LC for both draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13%20/> and draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang/>. As Med pointed out, this is likely one of the few times both a new protocol and its management model have been put forth at the same time. Please review these two drafts and provide all comments on-list. If you feel these are ready as-is, please state that as well. We will also renew our DIR reviews of these documents. More good news, we have shepherds for both. Med is acting as T+ TLS shepherd, and I will shepherd the YANG module. To give everyone a good chance to review, the WG LC will conclude on March 27. Joe and Benoît
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
