Ugh, Outlook. Thanks for catching that, Tom. Yes, the working link is https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13.
Joe From: tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> Date: Sunday, March 9, 2025 at 07:51 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com>, opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: WG LC: TACACS+ TLS and its YANG module (draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13 & draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang) Clicking on the link for ...secure-tacacs-yang I get 'Page not found'. I note that there is no trailing space in the URL after ...yang. I would hope that in the 21st century software was not the sensitive but perhaps it is. The I-D can be accessed from the WG web page. HTH Tom Petch ________________________________________ From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: 06 March 2025 13:48 Hello, WG! With the IPR polls concluded (no IPR has yet been disclosed), the authors feel that these two drafts are ready. Therefore, we are kicking off a three-week combined WG LC for both draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13%20/> and draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang/>. As Med pointed out, this is likely one of the few times both a new protocol and its management model have been put forth at the same time. Please review these two drafts and provide all comments on-list. If you feel these are ready as-is, please state that as well. We will also renew our DIR reviews of these documents. More good news, we have shepherds for both. Med is acting as T+ TLS shepherd, and I will shepherd the YANG module. To give everyone a good chance to review, the WG LC will conclude on March 27. Joe and Benoît
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
