Thanks, Thomas. -14 addressed my review concerns, and I see that the OAM terminology reference is removed here in -15. I think it’s in Giuseppe’s hands now to produce the write-up, and then we can move forward.
Perhaps one nit in your definition of the Encapsulating Node…since the decap node removes the OAM header, should the definition of the encap node also mention adding that header? Joe From: thomas.g...@swisscom.com <thomas.g...@swisscom.com> Date: Saturday, March 1, 2025 at 06:25 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com>, opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: RE: WG LAST CALL: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Dear Joe, Dear Giuseppe, Thanks a lot Giuseppe for taking on shepherd. On behalf of the authors, we submitted -15 with the following changes 1. Merged minor editorial input from Paul Aitken, Menachem Dodge and Martin Duke (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/YXts3FJjcXRBW1gnHUma5aGLVU0/,https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/KZ1eLLHgDb2WIucySnZJHUuneIM/) 2. Defined OAM terms and removed normative dependency Here the diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-15 Please let us know wherever this addresses your comments. Best wishes Thomas From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 6:37 PM To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>; opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) Be aware: This is an external email. We wanted to update the WG on this draft. First, we have a shepherd! Giuseppe Fioccola has agreed to shepherd the draft. Thank you! The next steps are to remove the reference to the OAM characterization document, publish another revision, await Giuseppe’s write-up, and then move this forward to the IESG. Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>> Date: Friday, October 25, 2024 at 09:29 To: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> <opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>> Subject: [OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) The WG LC has concluded. There were some comments raised that require follow-up and a new draft from the authors, but nothing blocking has been presented. Unfortunately, we didn’t get any directorate reviews. This document will be held pending the conclusion of LC on OAM characterization and a revised draft. Who would like to act as shepherd for this draft? Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com<mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, October 10, 2024 at 11:07 To: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> <opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>> Subject: WG LAST CALL: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) This starts a two week WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/>. The authors have been polled and there is no known IPR on this work that has been disclosed at this time. Please post comments and thoughts on this document’s readiness to the list. If you are interested in being the shepherd for this document, please email opsawg-chairs@. The WG LC will run until October 24. Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
