Hi All, I have reviewed the draft and I think it is ready. Regarding the Alternate-Marking Method, I suggest to add the reference to draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark in section 3.3.2 and section 7.5, since this document also describes the addition of the Timestamp Data Field, similarly to draft-zhou-ippm-enhanced-alternate-marking. I would also suggest to mention draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark as another option to use IPFIX to export timestamps and therefore calculate the delay.
Regards, Giuseppe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 5:08 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG]WG LAST CALL: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX) This starts a two week WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/>. The authors have been polled and there is no known IPR on this work that has been disclosed at this time. Please post comments and thoughts on this document's readiness to the list. If you are interested in being the shepherd for this document, please email opsawg-chairs@. The WG LC will run until October 24. Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
