Hi Michael, In the normative reference, [I-D .ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis] => RFC9499
Note sure why Idnits does not pick up this issue. Regards, Benoit On 8/15/2024 6:27 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Mahesh, https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-16&url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-17&difftype=--html contains changes to: * remove "geofenced" from the appendix * synchronizes expectation in Introduction for cooperation text in the Security Considerations. I would appreciate someone new to the document to proof the result. s/requires/required/ at least. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
